5. Fourth phase: Assessment phase 


The fourth phase of the WEFe Framework 2.0, the assessment phase, is the most extensive phase, offering an in-depth analysis of the interventions that have been identified in the previous phase. In this phase, the interventions and their potential to improve the nexus will be evaluated first using a desk-based analysis and then through a participatory approach.

The WEFe Framework 2.0 offers two methods to evaluate the potential performance of the selected interventions. If time or personnel resources are limited, these two methods can be further complemented with more sector-specific tools to assess certain processes and impacts in more detail. 


Desk-based performance assessment 

The bundle(s) of interventions identified in the previous phase will be assessed in terms of their potential to solve the WEFe nexus problems of the focal area. Thereby, it shall be ensured that the selected interventions are able to address the specific problem, i.e., that they help to reduce the use of water, energy or land and protect ecosystems, while ensuring that food production and local livelihoods are maintained or improved. This also means that trade-offs and synergies need to be considered. These two tools analyze “what if” scenarios, showing the potential impact of the interventions, combinations of interventions, or different implementation levels.

To undertake this desk-based assessment, two methods can be used:  

First, the REWEFe (Rapid Evaluation of the Water, Energy, Food and ecosystem) will be used to model scenarios on the impact of interventions on the WEFe nexus.  

Second, the Cost-Benefit Analysis allows evaluation of the economic advantages and disadvantages of the selected intervention.  

In the context of the WEFe Framework, the performance of an intervention relates to how well it contributes to solving the WEFe nexus problem. This means whether the intervention helps to balance the use of water, energy and land, and protect ecosystems, while ensuring that food production and local livelihoods are maintained or improved (i.e., creating synergies). The performance refers to the ability of an intervention to achieve improvements across multiple interrelated indicators, considering the complexity of managing the interconnected resources, and ecosystem boundaries.